As I'm sure some of our long time
readers can guess, we here at Horse News have quite the history with
the licensed IDW comics. From Ted Anderson to Jeremy Whitley to Andy
Price, we've had more than our fair share of run-ins. However, if
only to torture ourselves, some of our reporters still read the
comics. With the hiatus shorter than ever, their destraction purpose
is less relevant but they can always bring some laughs. With that
being said, issue #40, which attempts to tell the story of how
Twilight and Spike met, is worth a look for criticism's sake. Read a
Horse News review below.
Shades of Muffinshire
Sethisto already drew her
After
some brief bait for Sethisto and other assorted Trixiefags, Celestia
leads Twilight into a nursery where Spike is laying in a crib. She
claims that though she has been taking care of him since he was
hatched, it ultimately will be her responsibility to care for him
when she is incapable of doing so. Keep that comment in particular in
mind, as it becomes relevant later.
"Help"
What
follows for many pages is pretty much what we have come to expect
from IDW: basically some padding with shenanigans of Twilight being
stressed out by raising a child on her own and balancing her studies.
All of the ponies in the school (all female for some reason, possibly
courtesy of Ted “Not Like Those Other Guys” Anderson's bias or
maybe Hickey's desire for anime references) are incredibly uncaring
and unempathetic to Twilight's struggle in raising Spike. Perhaps
most bizarrely of these is Professor Inkwell, who, according to
previous issues, helped to make the school into what it was when
Twilight attended. That Celestia would not explain to her the duties
she was entrusted with seems oddly uncaring of her, like she either
expected that everyone would understand or she knew no one would see
it as an obstacle for her.
No sympathy for unwed teenage mothers
The
rest of the comic goes off well enough, with the expected marks:
Twilight brings Spike to a major event, he gets loose and causes a
mess, and she breaks down at him. In a fit of anger and stress, she
calls the infant Spike “stupid” and “a nuisance,” and
questions why he can't be anything like Smarty Pants. Spike's baby
talk in this scene slowly morphs into Twilight realizing that
Celestia meant for Spike to be her friend, and she bestows upon him
his name. The comic returns to the present day and everything is
fine.
"Yes, that's the plan...a friend..."
Princess
Celestia's depiction in the comic and her ultimate goals are
incredibly hard to discern in this comic. As a princess, she claims
that she does not have the time to raise Spike full-time, so she
gives him to Twilight. Her claim about her only being responsible for
him sometimes turns out to be a lie. What Celestia actually gives
Twilight turns out to be such a burden on her that not only is she
doing poorly in school and barely managing to take care of a newborn,
but she also is not making any friends.
That
Celestia would entrust a filly to raise a newborn as an experiment to
give her a friend raises some questions. Why involve Spike at all if
this is the goal, why not try to get other fillies who are on an
equal footing with her to be her friend? As we see several times in
the comic, Spike is completely dependent on her for his care, and is
not a friend to her in any form. One could assume that Celestia would
want their friendship to grow as they grew up together, but there in
lies another issue: Spike's role. What he eventually became, her
servant, undercut what Celestia supposedly was trying to do. He
helped her become obsessed with her studies and ultimately become a
hermit that required the mission to Ponyville at the start of the
series. If Celestia's plan was to convince Twilight to turn away from
making friends as a filly and “raise” a friend that would
contribute to her isolation as she grew up, she was absolutely
successful. However, if her actual goal was to give Twilight an
understanding of friendship, she totally failed. Twilight got a
responsibility that alienated herself from her peers and instead did
what she was ordered to do by Celestia. Some have argued that this
was the plan of Celestia all along, while others, such as this
reviewer, believe it to be a severe miscalculation of Celestia's that
ultimately comes down to bad writing and a desire to explain away
claims of incompetence.
Usually these edits are bad, but this is pretty on point.
Twilight
and Spike's relationship is that many fans of the series had a lot of
questions about. There was a lot of dread when this issue was
announced, fear that it would close doors that the show could explore
better. Those fears ultimately were unfounded. What we received
turned out to be a piece of fluff with some very bad implications for
Twilight and Spike's early life, plus even more questions about
Celestia's motivations relating to Twilight's destiny. I have not
mentioned the art at all in this review, but I will say that it was
definitely one of the high points of the issue. However that cannot
save a story that ultimately raises more questions than answers and
has unfortunate implications for nearly everyone involved. One can
only imagine what the author was thinking when he thought making
Twilight an unwed teenage mother was something that could be handled
well. Stick to Muffinshire folks, and pray that a post-Larson show
gives us some questions on this issue.
You said it, Spike
3/5
Pros:
- Good art by Brenda Hickey
- Trixie's mom
- Technically follows Faust interpretation of relationship
- Acceptable ending, taken out of context
Cons:
- Celestia's “IT'S JUST A TEST, BRO” explanation
- Contrived reasons for characters to be against Twilight
- Reason for sudden shift of Twilight's interpretation of the relationship is based on Celestia, not Twilight
- Celestia's character either being incompetent or openly malicious
- Explains quite a bit about Twilight's IDW depictions based on what she learned from Celestia
i came
ReplyDeleteSo how are these fears unfounded when
ReplyDelete>What we received turned out to be a piece of fluff with some very bad implications for Twilight and Spike's early life,
I mean if the comic explored it, why aren't the doors closed? Is it because they only explored the PARTS that we already figured anyway (thus making it fluff)? Or because OBVIOUSLY they can just do it again themselves if they want anyway, and they've retrod groundthe comics went over before, only not so hashed?
Or both?
Come on, give me a clue here. I'm late, tired, and I have no time to wait for an answer because this sexy Appaloosa in front of me isn't going to fuck herself!!!!!!
PURPLE TRANNY
ReplyDeleteU
R
P
L
E
T
R
A
N
N
Y
The important part to remember with things like this; the IDW comics aren't any more canon than any other fan works. The only difference is that IDW pays money to Hasbro so they can legally make a profit from selling their fan fiction.
ReplyDeleteThe important part to remember with things like this; the IDW comics aren't any more canon than any other fan works. The only difference is that IDW pays money to Hasbro so they can legally make a profit from selling their fan fiction.
ReplyDeleteHonestly, Ted is not the worst writer on the comics when he's not adding his social or worldview boners into the story. I mean he's not good and it doesn't stop him from showing his hand as an awful human being that socialises with other awful human beings but yeah, this and few other issues (the Pinkie Pie Micro and the Spike/Celestia FF ones) are... fine.
ReplyDeleteYou have no idea how hard it is to give credit to someone as slimy and unlikable as Ted is though and his Equestria Girls stuff for IDW has universally been shit.
http://knowyourmeme.com/photos/1093237-my-little-pony-friendship-is-magic?ref=chztrendingmpp
ReplyDeleteWHICH OF YOU DID THIS
Once again, Celestia proves herself to be a callous, manipulative sociopath who falls back on the old "It was totally a friendship test!" excuse any time her schemes start to unravel. Typical Canterlot elitist liberal.
ReplyDelete#Trot2016 #MakeEquestriaGreatAgain #BuildAWallAroundThatPlaceTheYaksCameFrom